MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390901758 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2023-0241

DFT + <i>U</i> investigation on high pressure properties of monoclinic CuO

2024· article· en· W4390901758 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zainab N. Jaf, Hussein A. Miran, M. Mahbubur Rahman, Amun Amri, Zhong‐Tao Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMonoclinic crystal systemHigh pressureThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This contribution demonstrates density functional theory calculations on the optoelectronic properties of monoclinic CuO under high pressures up to 15 GPa. In this account, the experimentally measured indirect band gap energy value of 1.41 eV has theoretically been predicted by tuning the Hubbard parameter ( U) values for the partial electronic states. The values of the Hubbard parameter correspond to UCu-3 d = 8 eV and UO-2 p = 4.5 eV. The electronic and optical characteristics were examined under applied pressure and the results reveal development in the band gap values with increasing pressure from 1.41 to 2.01 eV. Total and projected density of states for the adopted pressures have been provided and displayed that the major contribution in the valance and conduction bands comes from O-2 p and Cu-3 d electronic states, respectively. The plotted reflectivity data suggest high optical reflectivity magnitudes relatively in the ultraviolet area. The investigated systems under variant pressures manifest rather an excellent absorption coefficient in the ultraviolet area, pushing them to be employed in solar cell technologies. Our analyzed results of the wavelength-dependent electrical conductivity of the investigated materials confirm the absorptivity behavior in the ultraviolet and small part of visible region of electromagnetic waves (EMW). Finally and most importantly, our obtained results of loss functions for the entire surveyed systems reveal a slight energy loss in a range of EMW, including ultraviolet and visible regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207