Cryopreservation of highbush blueberry, strawberry, and saskatoon using V and D cryo-plate methods and monitoring of multiplication ability of regenerated shoots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this work was to apply V and D cryo-plate methods for cryopreservation of Vaccinium corymbosum ʻToroʼ, Fragaria × ananassa ʻCleryʼ, and Amelanchier alnifolia (Nutt.) M. Roem. and to monitor the multiplication capacity of shoots regenerated from cryopreserved explants. Shoot tips pre-cultured for 1 d at 23°C in the dark on medium containing 0.3 M sucrose were used as explants. Loading was performed in a solution containing 2 M glycerol and 0.8 M sucrose (30 min at room temperature). In the V cryo-plate, dehydration was carried out at room temperature (20 to 50 min) using the following plant vitrification solutions: original PVS2, 90% PVS2 solution, and PVS3. Regarding the D cryo-plate, dehydration was performed in closed glass containers over silica gel for 2, 2.5, or 3 h. In both protocols, rewarming was carried out in a 1.0 M sucrose solution (15 min at 25°C). Regenerated shoots were multiplied and multiplication parameters were monitored after the second subculture. Using the V cryo-plate method, the highest regrowth in highbush blueberry was obtained following 50-min treatment with all three VSs (61.7 to 80.9%). The D cryo-plate method was even more suitable with maximum regrowth of 89.4% achieved after 2.5 h of desiccation. For strawberry, 62.5% was the highest regrowth recorded using PVS3-based V cryo-plate method while 83.3% of regrowth was observed using D cryo-plate protocol. Regrowth of saskatoon reached a maximum of 50% after 50-min treatment with PVS3 while it did not exceed 40% in other treatments. By the second subculture, shoots regenerated from cryopreserved explants regained and even exceeded the multiplication capacity of shoots regenerated from non-cryopreserved explants. This study is the first to present the successful application of the V cryo-plate method in highbush blueberry, as well as the utilization of both V and D cryo-plate methods in saskatoon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".