MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390907222 · doi:10.1515/9782760325609-012

CHAPITRE 8 Enjeux et défis dans l’offre de services dans la langue de la minorité : l’expérience des professionnels bilingues dans le réseau de la santé et des services sociaux

2017· book-chapter· fr· W4390907222 on OpenAlex
Danielle de Moissac, Marie Drolet, Jacinthe Savard, Sébastien Savard, Florette Giasson, Josée Benoît, Isabelle Arcand, Josée Lagacé, Claire‐Jehanne Dubouloz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Press eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHAPITRE 8 Enjeux et défis dans l’offre de services dans la langue de la minorité : l’expérience des professionnels bilingues dans le réseau de la santé et des services sociaux was published in Accessibilité et offre active on page 205.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it