MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390927403 · doi:10.1515/9781771103718-001

Acknowledgments

2015· book-chapter· en· W4390927403 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The making of this edition has been protracted and thanks are due to many individuals and institutions.For reading and commenting on the text of the edition, our early gratitude goes to A.G. Rigg who read closely, corrected profusely, and made many helpful suggestions for our initial drafts of the Book of Visions and the Book of Prayers; also to Charles Burnett, who likewise read closely, corrected generously, and made many suggestions for the Old Compilation Book of Figures.Our more recent and special gratitude goes to Christopher McDonough, the reader for the press, who went over what we mistakenly thought was our final draft of the edition with a fine tooth comb, checking page by page against base manuscripts both in text and variants, carding out errors, drawing our attention to inconsistencies, suggesting solutions to problems, and turning up many nuggets of paleographical evidence along the way.His thoroughness went far beyond mere error correction.His reading not only provided many kinds of opportunities to improve our presentation of the evidence, but also gave us a deeper sense of the work itself.We remain profoundly grateful for his willingness to engage so deeply with our project in the last months of its completion.Others have assisted us over the years by sharing their historical, liturgical, paleographical and legal expertise.Richard Kieckhefer was much involved in our first encounter with John's text in the McMaster manuscript in Hamilton; it was he who recalled the passage in the Grandes Chroniques de France that records the burning of what turned out to be the Liber florum.He has continued to support us as we moved towards the editing of John's work.Frank Klaassen was also involved at an early stage; he gave assistance with the search for manuscripts of Liber florum and lent us digital reproductions of manuscripts of John's potential sources.To Sylvie Barnay we owe thanks for hospitality in Paris and for kindly sending us a copy of her book on apparitions of the Virgin, with its discussion of John.Julien Véronèse

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3880.284

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies eBooksSame topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207