MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390936870 · doi:10.1201/9781003317395-63

Arsenic contamination on sediments in the North and Tamiahua Beaches, Gulf of Mexico: Environmental implications

2024· book-chapter· en· W4390936870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Itzamna Zaknite Flores-Ocampo, J.S. Armstrog-Altrin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationOceanographyGeologyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental protectionGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies, particularly in sediments of the Gulf of Mexico, show that there are high concentrations of arsenic (As). In Norte Beach sediments, concentration of As varies from 3.55 to 25.7 mg/kg, with an average value of 11.641 mg/kg. Similarly, the As content in Tamiahua Beach varies between 0.8 and 2.10 mg/kg (avg. 1.36 mg/kg). Different indices were used to infer the enrichment, toxicity and risk to the aquatic environment. The enrichment factor (EF) and geo-accumulation index (I geo ) obtained for As in the North Beach were 6.7–53.1 and 2.16–5.14, respectively. However, in Tamiahua beach sediments As content EF and I geo values vary between 1.8 to 4.57 and 0.26–1.61, respectively. The Canadian Environmental Quality Guide (CEQG) divides concentrations into 2 levels: threshold effect (TEL) and probable effect (PEL), these levels define three probable biological effects. The As concentrations of the two beaches were between the TEL (threshold effect levels) and PEL (probable effect level). High concentration of As is due to the anthropogenic contamination derived from different industries located along the Gulf of Mexico coastal areas, which increase the possibility for adverse effect towards living organisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeavy metals in environment→French-language works237,207→