MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390948364 · doi:10.1002/anr3.12276

Anaesthetic management of a parturient with an unrepaired coronary arteriovenous fistula for caesarean section

2024· article· en· W4390948364 on OpenAlexaff
Eileen King, Samahah Alnahdi, Nathan Ludwig

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyArteriovenous fistulaInternal medicineHeart failureFistulaCaesarean sectionAnesthesiaSurgeryPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary arteriovenous fistulas are an abnormal conduit between a coronary artery and another cardiovascular lumen, without an intervening capillary bed. The reported prevalence is 0.002-0.3%. Physiologic consequences such as congestive heart failure, coronary steal phenomenon and fistula aneurysm formation and rupture are possible. There are limited reports of symptomatic coronary arteriovenous fistulas in association with pregnancy. We describe a 19-year-old woman with symptomatic left circumflex artery to coronary sinus fistula, terminating into a large exophytic varix in the right atrium, presenting for an elective caesarean section at 37 weeks gestational age. Our anaesthetic management strategy aimed to optimise myocardial perfusion, maintain euvolemia, avoid right ventricular obstruction from exophytic varix and avoid sympathetic stimulation or sudden increases in pulmonary vascular resistance. A slowly titrated epidural was used as the primary anaesthetic. Our patient tolerated the procedure well and was discharged home on postoperative day two. Understanding of the potential physiologic consequence of coronary arteriovenous fistulas, and interaction with the physiologic changes of pregnancy and delivery, are essential for the management of these cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesia ReportsSame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207