MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390952812 · doi:10.31235/osf.io/qfaj3

How October 7th, 2023, changed fear and exposure to hate amongst Jewish and Israeli members of universities

2024· preprint· en· W4390952812 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mateus Rennó Santos, Dikla Yogev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntisemitismJudaismRespondentPsychologySocial psychologyDemographyPolitical scienceHistorySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On October 7th (2023) nearly 1,200 persons were killed in Israel by members of Hamas. Since then, there are accounts of an increase in antisemitism and hate against Jewish individuals around the world, irrespective of their involvement with the ensuing conflict.We conducted a survey experiment using data from 202 members of universities in the United States, Canada and Europe who identified as Jewish or Israeli. Respondents were asked about their personal exposure to antisemitism, hate or antagonistic speech, and about their comfort level conducting everyday activities. In addition, we randomly assigned whether each respondent was asked those questions about the weeks before October 7th, the weeks after that day, or about recent weeks.We found extraordinarily high levels of exposure to hate and antagonism toward Jewish and Israeli individuals in the period prior to October 7, which was exacerbated significantly afterwards. In addition, a significant proportion of respondents no longer enjoy the same level of comfort expressing their culture or conducting simple daily activities (e.g., leaving their homes) as they did prior to October 7. According to respondents, institutions of higher education have been ineffective in addressing their safety concerns on campus. We conclude with a discussion of implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionFrench-language works237,207