MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390965366 · doi:10.1289/isee.2023.op-128

Geospatial modelling and socioeconomic inequalities of transportation, human, and nature-based sounds in Accra, Ghana

2023· article· en· W4390965366 on OpenAlex
Sierra Clark, Majid Ezzati, James E. Bennett, Raphael E. Arku, Abosede S. Alli, Ricky Nathvani, James Nimo, Josephine Bedford Moses, Solomon Baah, Allison Hughes, Alicia Cavanaugh, Brian E. Robinson, Samuel Mensah, George Owusu, Michael Bräuer, Mireille B. Toledano

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsGeospatial analysisSocioeconomic statusGeographyInequalityEnvironmental healthEnvironmental planningEnvironmental protectionSocioeconomicsCartographyMedicinePopulationSociologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Urban environments are filled with mixtures of mechanical, human, and nature-based sounds, which can be detrimental, neutral, or even beneficial to physical and psychological health. The majority of epidemiological studies have focused on the harmful effects of transportation noise exposure, and there is a major gap in city-scale information on the distribution of other types of sounds which may impact health and wellbeing. METHOD: Within a large-scale multi-pollutant measurement campaign in Accra, Ghana, we collected a novel dataset of audio recordings at 146 locations over 1yr. The recordings were processed with a pre-trained neural network to classify different types of sounds and then modelled with Random Forest land use regression (LUR) to make predictions across the city with both day and night-time models. We also investigated possible socioeconomic (SES) inequalities by linking the sound predictions to small area data on household consumption, higher educational attainment, and unemployment. RESULTS: LUR model performance, assessed with 10fold cross-validation, was good for road-transport and animal sounds (R2 range 0.37 – 0.70), moderate for human speech and music (R2 range 0.21-0.42), and poor for nature sounds (R2 range: 0 – 0.10). The prevalence of road-traffic sounds was highest in the urban core and along major motorways (median: 63%-42%), human speech and music in low-income high-density residential neighbourhoods (median: 9%-23%), and animal sounds in peri-urban areas (median: 64-71%). There was a weak inverse association between road-traffic sounds and SES (Pearson correlation (r): -0.16 to -0.20). Conversely, animal sounds (like birds) are often described in soundscape surveys as ‘calming’ and ‘pleasant’ and were more prevalent in wealthier neighbourhoods (r: 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: We have illustrated a high-resolution approach to characterising the abundance of a variety of sound types at city scale, which can be incorporated into epidemiological investigations of the direct and interactive effects of harmful and/or potentially beneficial sound exposures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it