Data-driven trait heritability-based extraction of human facial phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of a complex, multi-dimensional morphological trait, such as the human face, typically relies on predefined and simplified phenotypic measurements, such as inter-landmark distances and angles. These measures are predominantly designed by human experts based on perceived biological or clinical knowledge. To avoid use handcrafted phenotypes (i.e., a priori expert-identified phenotypes), alternative automatically extracted phenotypic descriptors, such as features derived from dimension reduction techniques (e.g., principal component analysis), are employed. While the features generated by such computational algorithms capture the geometric variations of the biological shape, they are not necessarily genetically relevant. Therefore, genetically informed data-driven phenotyping is desirable. Here, we propose an approach where phenotyping is done through a data-driven optimization of trait heritability, defined as the degree of variation in a phenotypic trait in a population that is due to genetic variation. The resulting phenotyping process consists of two steps: 1) constructing a feature space that models shape variations using dimension reduction techniques, and 2) searching for directions in the feature space exhibiting high trait heritability using a genetic search algorithm (i.e., heuristic inspired by natural selection). We show that the phenotypes resulting from the proposed trait heritability-optimized training differ from those of principal components in the following aspects: 1) higher trait heritability, 2) higher SNP heritability, and 3) identification of the same number of independent genetic loci with a smaller number of effective traits. Our results demonstrate that data-driven trait heritability-based optimization enables the automatic extraction of genetically relevant phenotypes, as shown by their increased power in genome-wide association scans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".