MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Preliminary Investigation into Use of Admission-Recorded Photoplethysmograms for Predicting Hospital Mortality in Children with Confirmed or Suspected Infection in Resource-Poor Settings

2023· article· en· W4390971188 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Hossein Rahimi, Matthew O. Wiens, Jerome Kabakyenga, J. Mark Ansermino, Guy A. Dumont

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersGrand Challenges CanadaThrasher Research Fund
KeywordsCohortMedicinePredictive valueDemographicsPediatricsMachine learningInternal medicineDemographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although there have been notable advances in child survival, the rate of infection-related hospital fatalities remains high among pediatric patients in resource-limited settings. Hence, the critical need for enhancing child survival demands immediate attention. Present risk prediction tools for in-hospital complications have been developed through statistical modelling methods and exhibit specific constraints. This study sought to create and compare an array of machine learning-based models using admission-recorded information to predict all-cause in-patient death in two cohorts of children in Uganda: those under 6 months and those aged between 6 and 60 months. 190 (7.0%) out of 2,698 children under six months and 164 (4.3%) out of 3,835 children over six months of age died following admission. For each cohort, five supervised machine learning algorithms were trained and internally validated on 67% and 33% of the data, respectively. The models incorporated demographics, clinical variables, and photoplethysmography-extracted features as inputs. The balanced random forest classifier demonstrated superior performance on the test set in both cohorts. In the first cohort, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.95, specificity of 0.71, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.15, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99. Comparing this to the model that exclusively utilized demographic and clinical parameters, an increase of 14.5% was observed in sensitivity, while specificity and PPV experienced reductions of 4% and 11.8%, respectively. NPV, however, remained unchanged. In the second cohort, the model's sensitivity was 0.75, with a specificity of 0.73, a PPV of 0.08, and an NPV of 0.99. Upon training the model with only demographic and clinical variables in this cohort, the corresponding metrics were 0.67, 0.76, 0.09, and 0.98, respectively. By integrating photoplethysmography data with machine learning algorithms, it may be possible to develop predictive models that can identify high-risk patients who are more likely to experience adverse outcomes like in-hospital death. Such models could empower healthcare providers in ill-equipped settings to allocate limited resources effectively and deliver targeted interventions to those most in need.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmergency and Acute Care Studies→French-language works237,207→