Studi Perencanaan Kolam Retensi Untuk Menanggulangi Banjir pada Afvoer Watudakon Kabupaten Mojokerto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sungai Afvoer Watudakon berlokasi di Kabupaten Mojokerto sering mengalami banjir tahunan yang terjadi akibat alih fungsi lahan dari lahan pertanian menjadi pemukiman penduduk serta secara topografi posisi DAS Afvoer Watudakon berada di daerah cekungan, sehingga diperlukan upaya untuk mengurangi beban limpasan yang diterima oleh Sungai Afvoer Watudakon. Dalam studi ini digunakan rumus debit banjir rancangan metode drain module serta metode rasional dengan kala ulang Q25 = 132,94 m3/det. lalu dilakukan analisa hidraulik dengan aplikasi HEC-RAS 5.0.7 guna mendapatkan debit yang dapat dialirkan oleh siphon watudakon sebesar Q = 95,07 m3/det. dengan metode De Marchi didapatkan pelimpah samping sepanjang 25 m dan tinggi pelimpah 4,1 m dengan sudut masuk pelimpah 60°, serta luas kolam retensi dengan volume tampungan 205.314 m3 dengan 2 pompa berkapasitas 3 m3/det serta dilengkapi dengan dinding penahan tanah dengan tinggi 6 m yang telah disimulasikan terhadap beberapa kombinasi kondisi pada aplikasi Plaxis V20 dan dinyatakan aman terhadap semua kondisi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".