Studi Perencanaan Kolam Retensi Untuk Menanggulangi Banjir pada Afvoer Watudakon Kabupaten Mojokerto
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sungai Afvoer Watudakon berlokasi di Kabupaten Mojokerto sering mengalami banjir tahunan yang terjadi akibat alih fungsi lahan dari lahan pertanian menjadi pemukiman penduduk serta secara topografi posisi DAS Afvoer Watudakon berada di daerah cekungan, sehingga diperlukan upaya untuk mengurangi beban limpasan yang diterima oleh Sungai Afvoer Watudakon. Dalam studi ini digunakan rumus debit banjir rancangan metode drain module serta metode rasional dengan kala ulang Q25 = 132,94 m3/det. lalu dilakukan analisa hidraulik dengan aplikasi HEC-RAS 5.0.7 guna mendapatkan debit yang dapat dialirkan oleh siphon watudakon sebesar Q = 95,07 m3/det. dengan metode De Marchi didapatkan pelimpah samping sepanjang 25 m dan tinggi pelimpah 4,1 m dengan sudut masuk pelimpah 60°, serta luas kolam retensi dengan volume tampungan 205.314 m3 dengan 2 pompa berkapasitas 3 m3/det serta dilengkapi dengan dinding penahan tanah dengan tinggi 6 m yang telah disimulasikan terhadap beberapa kombinasi kondisi pada aplikasi Plaxis V20 dan dinyatakan aman terhadap semua kondisi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it