MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390989860 · doi:10.1111/aos.16017

A novel AI‐powered IR‐Visible dual camera system for measuring and tracking ocular surface temperature

2024· article· en· W4390989860 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Zare Bidaki, Alexander Wong, Navid Shahsavari, Paul J. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Ophthalmologica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceSegmentationVideo cameraTracking (education)CorneaPixelFrame rateOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims/Purpose: To report the development of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) powered, dual camera (infrared (IR)/visible) system capable of measuring and tracking ocular surface temperature (OST) over any time period. Methods: The system consists of an IR camera (Teledyne FLIR IR A655sc) and a visible (V) camera (FLIR BFS 51S5C‐C), co‐mounted on a slit‐lamp for simultaneous and overlapping fields of view (FOV); designed control algorithms; computer hardware and connecting cables. Novel algorithms are leveraged to synchronize IR and V video streams of exposed ocular surface and adnexa for image and video registration. Localisation of the cornea in V video stream obtained by deep learning (DL) AI algorithms designed for semantic segmentation of the cornea. Coordinates of V video stream segmented cornea are then used to extract corresponding OST data from the IR video stream in each video stream frame. Data analysis algorithms are used to extract OST data from IR video stream. Further image segmentation algorithms isolated specific areas of interest (AOI) for OST analysis. Results: The DL algorithm was trained using V images captured using the V camera. Image registration and segmentation errors were calculated to determine accuracy of system. Mean square error for registration was 5.03 ± 1.82 (c.0.45 mm). Mean Intersection over Union (IoU) was 97.6%, representing accuracy in identifying corneal and scleral pixels in tracked eye segmentation. Analysis software extracted rate of OST change and relative OST change compared to baseline across cornea and selected AOI. Conclusions: A novel AI‐powered system for measuring and tracking OST over time was developed. The system synchronously records IR and V video streams of the eye surface and automatically extracts OST over time. The system can track eye movements and remove artefact eyelid blink frames from the data. A consistent AOI, i.e., pupil, whole cornea, inferior half, superior half, or selected corneal region, can be selected for OST extraction and analysis over time. Experimental results show that the system can track and analyse OST change over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OphthalmologicaSame topicOcular Surface and Contact LensFrench-language works237,207