MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Morphological Guided Causal Constraint Network for Medical Image Multi-Object Segmentation

2023· article· en· W4390992101 on OpenAlexaff
Yifan Gao, Jun Li, Xinyue Chang, Yulong Zhang, Riqing Chen, Changcai Yang, Yi Wei, Heng Dong, Lifang Wei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Fujian ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSegmentationComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Image segmentationRepresentation (politics)Constraint (computer-aided design)DecorrelationSimilarity (geometry)Object (grammar)Scale-space segmentationDiceComputer visionBoundary (topology)Medical imagingSample (material)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-objective segmentation (MOS) in medical images is to simultaneously extract multiple regions of interest in the medical images. Due to the unbalanced distribution of samples and the similarity and significant differences between features in medical images, current methods still struggle to achieve satisfactory results. In this context, we propose a novel Morphological Guided Causal Constrain segmentation network (MCCSeg) for medical image multi-object segmentation. We introduced a Causal Constrain Module (CCM) for feature decorrelation by sample reweighting. The morphological guidance module (MG) is designed to extract the boundary features as the prior shape information for enhancing feature representation. Our experiments demonstrate that MCCSeg outperforms other state-of-the-art methods, obtaining up 3.76% and 5.41% improvements in DICE and HD95 scores on Synapse dataset, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207