MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390993726 · doi:10.61902/motorik.v18i2.936

PENGARUH TERAPI COGNITIVE REHABILITATION TERHADAP FUNGSI KOGNITIF PASIEN SKIZOFRENIA

2023· article· en· W4390993726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rita Untari, F. Eka Safitri

Bibliographic record

VenueMOTORIK Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationCognitionCognitive rehabilitation therapyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPsychologyWilcoxon signed-rank testSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Mann–Whitney U testClinical psychologyCognitive InterventionTest (biology)Physical therapyMedicinePsychiatryCognitive impairmentInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder, organized into multiple dysfunctional domains including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognitive impairment, mood, carelessness, and aggression. Impaired cognitive function is an inability in attention, memory, consideration, problem solving, and the ability of executives such as planning, assessing, monitoring and evaluating. One of cognitive deficit therapy in schizophrenia is Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR) therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is an influence between cognitive therapy rehabilitation of cognitive function in schizophrenic patients. This research used Quasi Experiment with non-random pretest and posttest with control group design and method of data analysis used comparative test which is wilcoxon test and mann-whitney test. This research was done on schizophrenia patients in RSJD dr. Arif Zainudin Surakarta with 32 samples divided into control group (n = 15) and intervention group (n = 17). The cognitive function examination was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) version of Indonesia which has been validate. Interventions were done for during 6 sessions for 2 weeks and were done in groups. The cognitive function score in the control group, the pretest mean was 20.26 and the post-test mean was 21.60. For the function score in the intervention group, the average pretest score was 21.8, while the average post-test score was 25.6. The results of the research data analysis used the Wilcoxon test on the pretest and post-test of the control group with sig. 0.000 with a p-value <0.05; Wilcoxon test on pretest and post-test in the intervention group with sig. 0.000 with a p-value <0.05; Mann-Whitney test in the control-intervention group with sig. 000 with a p-value <0.05. This indicates that there is a significant difference in cognitive function abilities between the control group and the intervention group who underwent cognitive rehabilitation therapy for schizophrenia patients at RSJD Dr. Arif Zainudin Surakarta. This research shows a significant difference value between the control group and the intervention group. The result of the comparative test of both groups found that there was a significant effect on cognitive rehabilitation therapy on cognitive function in schizophrenic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMOTORIK Jurnal Ilmu KesehatanSame topicFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFrench-language works237,207