MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391000205 · doi:10.1515/9781782041771-003

Preface

2013· book-chapter· en· W4391000205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBoydell and Brewer eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why study the Marines?In the years I have been researching and writing this work I've been asked this question countless times.It is usually quickly followed by, 'You mean the US Marine Corps, right?', which make sense being that I am an American.The truth is, I am interested in the first Marine Corps, the British, and their story is more interesting than previous scholarship would have you believe.In some small way telling their story is the primary purpose of this book.Marines, particularly in the eighteenth century, were not something unique to the British, as every European power with a naval force -including the fledgling United States by the end of the century -had a Marine Force of some kind.There then needs to be at least a statement about why the British are a unique model compared to their contemporaries.The French and Spanish had the largest naval services in the eighteenth century after the British, and both created and experimented with their Marine Forces.Both of these countries tried to develop different structural and administrative approaches to answer complex issues surrounding sea service.They both experimented with regimental and independent company structures.In 1717 the Spanish restructured their old Marines into the Cuerpo de Batallones de Marina, creating a force based on an independent battalion concept and giving it the structural flexibility necessary for sea services.The French Les Troupes de Marine in the eighteenth century were used operationally to guard the empire -famously so in Canada -alongside traditional sea service duties.These two countries' services were similar to the Marine regiments of the 1664-1749 period.If the comparison ended there it would give validity to the claim that these organisations were older, and potentially developed many of these methods before the British.However, the 1755 Marine Corps changed this and should be considered the first modern Marine Force.It is no coincidence that this happened during the largest global war the British nation was involved in to date, the Seven Years War, or the French and Indian War as it is known in the Americas.The new Marine Corps -this was the official name given to the British service at the time -while maintaining elements of the past was transforming into something new.Time and experience in amphibious settings was one major advantage the British marines had over all other Marine ix

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoydell and Brewer eBooksSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207