Effect of flyash addition to flocculation and freezing and thawing treatment on consolidation of oil sands fluid fine tailings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The total volume of fluid fine tailings (FFT), reached 1,270 Mm 3 in 2019. Extensive research is underway by a number of operators to develop dewatering technologies for oil sand tailings reclamation to comply with Directive 085 issued by the Alberta Energy Regulator. A promising technology for the disposal of FFT is to add flocculents and then use thickeners or centrifuges to decrease the water content. Following this treatment, freezing/thawing processes can then be utilized to further dewater the tailings. The effect of flocculation/flyash addition and thickening coupled with freezing/thawing treatments on FFT was investigated by performing large-strain consolidation and shear strength tests on the treated flocculated TTs. It was found that flocculation and thickening treatment increases the hydraulic conductivity of the treated TT which will result in the TT consolidating much faster than the untreated TT. The most important benefit of the flyash addition is the increase in shear strength and hydraulic conductivity of the flyash-treated TTs. The benefit of the freezing/thawing treatment processes coupled with flyash treatment is the increase in the compressibility and hydraulic conductivity at effective stresses lower than 100 kPa and void ratios greater than 1.2, respectively. This will facilitate earlier progressive reclamation required to support hydraulic sand capping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it