MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391028243 · doi:10.4236/oalib.1111111

Evaluation of the Relationship between ADHD and Comorbid Psychiatric Conditions: A Comprehensive Study on a Large Cohort

2024· article· en· W4391028243 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOALib · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortPsychiatryPsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study analyzes the intricate psychiatric landscape accompanying attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), focusing on the prevalence and nature of comorbidities among diverse gender categories, including transgender and non-binary individuals.We examined data from 1528 participants using standardized diagnostic tools through the ADHDtest.aiwebsite under the leadership of MD Adeel Sarwar.Our findings reveal a noticeable prevalence of anxiety disorders, especially in the non-binary (63.2%) and transgender (37.5%) populations, indicating an urgent need for healthcare services tailored to their needs.Additionally, among females with an ADHD diagnosis, 44.97% reported no pre-existing conditions, suggesting a distinctive presentation of ADHD in this demographic.Our approach deviates from traditional views, such as those presented in the 2016 study by Caye et al., which posited that adult ADHD must derive from childhood.The prior research, which followed 5249 Brazilian youths into adulthood, relied on DSM-5 criteria to identify ADHD's continuity from childhood.By contrast, our study, with subjects primarily from the USA, UK, and Canada, emphasizes a nuanced gender distribution and highlights the importance of considering ADHD as possibly representing a divergent developmental path rather than solely an extension from childhood.This research stresses the necessity of gender-specific considerations in ADHD diagnosis and treatment, mirroring the National Institute of Mental Health's recommendation for a multifaceted evaluative method to improve clinical outcomes.The data, anonymized to protect privacy, illuminates the intersection between ADHD and various psychiatric disorders, including gender-specific variations in clinical presentation and comorbidity profiles.By centering on severe ADHD manifestations in females and incorporating the experiences of transgender and non-binary in *PhD Programme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it