MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391030662 · doi:10.31083/j.ceog5101008

The Relationship between Maternal Perinatal Depression and Offspring Depression: A Meta-Analysis

2024· article· en· W4391030662 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qing Yang, Wei Mi, Fang Su, Wei Song

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineOffspringDepression (economics)Antenatal depressionMeta-analysisObstetricsPregnancyPsychiatryInternal medicineDepressive symptomsAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Antepartum depression, with an incidence of 20.7%, is a pressing global public health concern due to its detrimental effects on both the physical and mental health of pregnant women, as well as the potential risk it poses for depression in their offspring. Nevertheless, there is a lack of consensus among existing studies regarding this issue. Here, we systematically evaluated the relationship between maternal perinatal depression and offspring depression by meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant studies in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System databases. The prospective cohort studies, which were published in English or Chinese, reported the occurrence of maternal prenatal and/or postnatal depression within one year postpartum and assessed the subsequent development of depression in their offspring, were included. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed. Publication bias was evaluated with a funnel plot. Results: Totally, 12 studies were included. The meta-analysis found that maternal perinatal depression increased the risk of offspring depression by 1.64 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.37, 1.96, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the risk of offspring depression was significantly increased in the European population with maternal perinatal depression (odds ratio (OR) = 1.90, 95% CI (1.49, 2.42), p < 0.001), but not in the Australian and the American populations. The combined effect sizes of maternal antepartum and postpartum depression were (OR = 1.70, 95% CI (1.27, 2.27), p < 0.001) and (OR = 1.74, 95% CI (1.31, 2.32), p < 0.001), respectively. The combined effect size of the relationship of maternal perinatal depression with offspring depression in childhood and adulthood was (OR = 1.70, 95% CI (1.28, 2.25), p < 0.001) and (OR = 1.60, 95% CI (1.27, 2.02), p < 0.001), respectively. The adjusted and unadjusted combined effect sizes were (OR = 1.44, 95% CI (1.14, 1.82), p < 0.001) and (OR = 1.97, 95% CI (1.49, 2.60), p < 0.001), respectively. There may be some publication bias in the included studies. Conclusions: Maternal perinatal depression is associated with an increased risk of depression in offspring. Effective prevention and management of depression in perinatal women is necessary to mitigate the risk of depression in offspring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologySame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207