MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391030718 · doi:10.31083/j.jin2301016

The Effect of p.G2019S Mutation in the LRRK2 Gene on the Activity of Lysosomal Hydrolases and the Clinical Features of Parkinson's Disease Associated with p.N370S Mutation in the GBA1 Gene

2024· article· en· W4391030718 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tatiana Usenko, Alla Timofeeva, Mariia Beletskaia, Katerina Basharova, Galina Baydakova, Anastasia Bezrukova, M. N. Grunina, Anton Emelyanov, Irina Miliukhina, Ekaterina Zakharova, Sofya Pchelina

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Neuroscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Science Foundation
KeywordsLRRK2GlucocerebrosidaseSphingolipidParkinson's diseaseAcid sphingomyelinaseInternal medicineMutationBiologyMedicineBiochemistryDiseaseGeneSphingomyelinCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mutations in the glucocerebrosidase (GBA1) and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) genes, encoding lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase) and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), respectively, are the most common related to Parkinson’s disease (PD). Recent data suggest a possible functional interaction between GCase and LRRK2 and their involvement in sphingolipid metabolism. The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical course and evaluate the lysosomal enzyme activities and sphingolipid concentrations in blood of patients with PD associated with dual mutations p.N370S GBA1 and p.G2019S LRRK2 (p.N370S/GBA-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD) as well as in blood of asymptomatic mutation carriers (p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-carrier). Methods: One patient with p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD and one p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-carrier were enrolled. GBA1-associated PD (GBA1-PD), LRRK2-associated PD (LRRK2-PD), sporadic PD (sPD) patients were described earlier by our research group. A neuropsychiatric examination of the p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD patient was carried out using scales (Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA), Mini-mental State Examination scale (MMSE), Frontal Assessment Batter scale (FAB), Hospital Anxiety, and Depression Scale (HADS), etc). Lysosomal enzyme activity (GCase, alpha-galactosidase [GLA], acid sphingomyelinase [ASMase], galactosylcerebrosidase [GALC]) and sphingolipid concentrations (hexasylsphingosine [HexSph], lysoglobotriaosylsphingosine [LysoGb3], lysosphingomyelin [LysoSM]) were assessed with high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in blood. The following comparison with the previously described groups of GBA1-PD and sPD patients were conducted. Results: Clinical features of p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD included an early age of onset of the disease (46 years) and mild cognitive and affective disorders (MMSE = 29, MoCA = 23), despite a long (24 years) course of the disease. Interestingly, no differences were found in hydrolase activity and lysosphingolipid concentrations between the p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD patient and GBA1-PD patients. However, GCase activity was lower in these groups than in LRRK2-PD, sPD, and controls. Additionally, the p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD patient was characterized by a pronounced decreased in ASMase activity and increased LysoSM concentration compared to the p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-carrier (p = 0.023, p = 0.027, respectively). Conclusions: Based on one patient, our results indicate a protective effect of the p.G2019S mutation in the LRRK2 gene on clinical course of p.N370S/GBA1-PD. The identified pronounced alteration of ASMase activity and LysoSM concentration in p.N370S/GBA1-p.G2019S/LRRK2-PD provide the basis for the further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Integrative NeuroscienceSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207