MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391036123 · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.061

The role of funded partnerships in working towards decreasing COVID-19 vaccination disparities, United States, March 2021—December 2022

2024· article· en· W4391036123 on OpenAlexaff
Amy Parker Fiebelkorn, Sara Adelsberg, Rishelle Anthony, Samrawit Ashenafi, Amimah F. Asif, Maria Azzarelli, Theresa Bailey, Timothy Tee Boddie, Alaina Boyer, Nicole Bungum, Helen Burstin, Jacqueline L. Burton, David M. Casey, Cammie Chaumont Menéndez, Brigette Courtot, Kelly Cronin, C. Dowdell, Laura Downey, Megan Fields, Tom Fitzsimmons, Alexa Frank, Emily Gustafson, Margaret Gutierrez, Benita Harris, Joanna Hill, Kathleen Holmes, Laura Huerta Migus, Joanna Jacob Kuttothara, Natalie Johns, Jennifer E. Johnson, Lucy Kingangi, Cynthia M. Landrum, James T. Lee, Pedro Daniel Martínez, Gisela Medina Martínez, Richard Nicholls, Jane R. Nilson, Nma Ohiaeri, Laura Pegram, Alexandra M. Piasecki, Talia Pindyck, S.J. Price, Michelle S. Rodgers, Heather L Roney, Ellen Schultz, Elizabeth Sobczyk, JoAnn M. Thierry, Chelsea Toledo, Nancy E. Weiss, Amy Wiatr-Rodriguez, Lauren Williams, Chenmua Yang, Andrea Yao, Julie Zajac

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsWindsor Clinical Research
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsOutreachVaccinationHealth careHealth equityMedicineEquity (law)Psychological interventionFamily medicinePublic healthBusinessPolitical scienceNursingImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the COVID-19 vaccination rollout from March 2021- December 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded 110 primary and 1051 subrecipient partners at the national, state, local, and community-based level to improve COVID-19 vaccination access, confidence, demand, delivery, and equity in the United States. The partners implemented evidence-based strategies among racial and ethnic minority populations, rural populations, older adults, people with disabilities, people with chronic illness, people experiencing homelessness, and other groups disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. CDC also expanded existing partnerships with healthcare professional societies and other core public health partners, as well as developed innovative partnerships with organizations new to vaccination, including museums and libraries. Partners brought COVID-19 vaccine education into farm fields, local fairs, churches, community centers, barber and beauty shops, and, when possible, partnered with local healthcare providers to administer COVID-19 vaccines. Inclusive, hyper-localized outreach through partnerships with community-based organizations, faith-based organizations, vaccination providers, and local health departments was critical to increasing COVID-19 vaccine access and building a broad network of trusted messengers that promoted vaccine confidence. Data from monthly and quarterly REDCap reports and monthly partner calls showed that through these partnerships, more than 295,000 community-level spokespersons were trained as trusted messengers and more than 2.1 million COVID-19 vaccinations were administered at new or existing vaccination sites. More than 535,035 healthcare personnel were reached through outreach strategies. Quality improvement interventions were implemented in healthcare systems, long-term care settings, and community health centers resulting in changes to the clinical workflow to incorporate COVID-19 vaccine assessments, recommendations, and administration or referrals into routine office visits. Funded partners' activities improved COVID-19 vaccine access and addressed community concerns among racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as among people with barriers to vaccination due to chronic illness or disability, older age, lower income, or other factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccineSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207