MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391051693 · doi:10.1029/2023gb007803

A Synthesis of Global Coastal Ocean Greenhouse Gas Fluxes

2024· article· en· W4391051693 on OpenAlexaff
Laure Resplandy, Allison Hogikyan, Jens Daniel Müller, Raymond G. Najjar, Hermann W. Bange, Daniele Bianchi, Thomas Weber, Wei‐Jun Cai, Scott C. Doney, Katja Fennel, Marion Gehlen, Judith Hauck, Fabrice Lacroix, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Alizée Roobaert, Jörg Schwinger, Sarah Berthet, Laurent Bopp, Thi Tuyet Trang Chau, Minhan Dai, Nicolas Gruber, Tatiana Ilyina, Annette Kock, Manfredi Manizza, Zouhair Lachkar, Goulven G. Laruelle, Enhui Liao, Ivan D. Lima, Cara Nissen, Christian Rödenbeck, Roland Séférian, Katsuya Toyama, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Pierre Regnier

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersClimate Program OfficeNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNuclear Safety and Security CommissionFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean CommissionBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceBiogeochemical cycleSink (geography)Greenhouse gasOceanographyLatitudeClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesCarbon cycleGeologyChemistryGeographyEnvironmental chemistryEcosystemEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The coastal ocean contributes to regulating atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations by taking up carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and releasing nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ). In this second phase of the Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2), we quantify global coastal ocean fluxes of CO 2 , N 2 O and CH 4 using an ensemble of global gap‐filled observation‐based products and ocean biogeochemical models. The global coastal ocean is a net sink of CO 2 in both observational products and models, but the magnitude of the median net global coastal uptake is ∼60% larger in models (−0.72 vs. −0.44 PgC year −1 , 1998–2018, coastal ocean extending to 300 km offshore or 1,000 m isobath with area of 77 million km 2 ). We attribute most of this model‐product difference to the seasonality in sea surface CO 2 partial pressure at mid‐ and high‐latitudes, where models simulate stronger winter CO 2 uptake. The coastal ocean CO 2 sink has increased in the past decades but the available time‐resolving observation‐based products and models show large discrepancies in the magnitude of this increase. The global coastal ocean is a major source of N 2 O (+0.70 PgCO 2 ‐e year −1 in observational product and +0.54 PgCO 2 ‐e year −1 in model median) and CH 4 (+0.21 PgCO 2 ‐e year −1 in observational product), which offsets a substantial proportion of the coastal CO 2 uptake in the net radiative balance (30%–60% in CO 2 ‐equivalents), highlighting the importance of considering the three greenhouse gases when examining the influence of the coastal ocean on climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207