Obstructive sleep apnea in those with idiopathic intracranial hypertension undergoing diagnostic in-laboratory polysomnography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: The association of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) remains unclear, and few studies have used objective in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) data. Thus, we used PSG data to examine the: 1) association between OSA, and its severity, with IIH and 2) sex differences in OSA severity in those with and without IIH. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed diagnostic PSG data from January 2015 to August 2023 for patients who were diagnosed with IIH by a neuro-ophthalmologist using the modified Dandy criteria. We selected three age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) matched controls for each IIH patient. We examined potential associations of IIH with OSA using regression. Sex differences were analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: Of 3482 patients who underwent PSG, we analyzed 78 IIH patients (16 males) and 234 matched controls (48 males). Five (6.4 %) IIH and 39 (16.7 %) control patients had OSA, defined as AHI≥15. After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities, IIH was negatively associated with the presence of OSA (OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.10-0.87, p = 0.03). However, models that adjusted for acetazolamide use, with or without comorbidities, showed no significant relationship with OSA (OR 0.31, p = 0.20). Males with IIH had a significantly higher age (p = 0.020), OSA severity (p = 0.032), and arousal index (p = 0.046) compared to females with IIH. CONCLUSIONS: IIH treated with acetazolamide was not an independent risk factor for OSA presence or severity. The presence of IIH treated with acetazolamide likely does not warrant routine screening for OSA, but related risk factors may identify appropriate patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".