AGV Quality of Service Throughput Prediction via Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent development of Autonomous Guided Vehicles (AGV) use in industry has resulted in the need to model new solutions based on the latest technological achievements. One of the areas worth attention and development is Quality of Service (QoS) in relation to communication between vehicles. QoS makes it possible to divide the bandwidth in such a way that tasks performed by devices are completed with a certain priority. However, in order to manage these resources effectively, it is necessary to anticipate available network throughput. Therefore, this paper presents a neural-based model to ensure throughput prediction for AGV. The proposed solution assumes the use of information on both historical throughput values and data obtained from other sensors that AGV are equipped with. Therefore, the idea is to integrate two neural networks with another network, which is supposed to predict the result based on these two previously obtained predictions. Ultimately, prediction results with a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.1 for the downlink and 1.6 for the uplink were obtained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it