Human Behavior Recognition Based on CNN-LSTM Hybrid and Multi-Sensing Feature Information Fusion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To address the human activity recognition problem and its application in practical situations, a CNN-LSTM hybrid neural network model capable of automatically extracting sensor data features and memorizing temporal activity data is designed and improved by integrating CNN and gated recurrent units as a variant of RNN. A multi-channel spatiotemporal fusion network-based two-person interaction behavior recognition method is proposed for two-person skeletal sequential behavior recognition. Firstly, a viewpoint invariant feature extraction method is used to extract two-player skeleton features, then a two-layer cascaded spatiotemporal fusion network model is designed, and finally, a multi-channel spatiotemporal fusion network is used to learn multiple sets of two-player skeleton features separately to obtain multi-channel fusion features, and the fusion features are used to recognize the interaction behavior, and the weights are shared among the channels. Applying the algorithm in the paper to the UCF101 dataset for experiments, the accuracy of the two-person cross-object experiment can reach 96.42% and the accuracy of the cross-view experiment can reach 97.46%. The method in the paper shows better performance in two-player interaction behavior recognition compared to typical methods in this field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it