MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning based Chatbot Architecture for Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendation

2023· article· en· W4391129772 on OpenAlexaff
Girish Rajani, Khushi Ruparel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in Service Interactions
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMedical diagnosisChatbotMachine learningArtificial intelligenceArchitectureNaive Bayes classifierClassifier (UML)The InternetSupport vector machineWorld Wide WebMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the exponential growth and rapid development in the fields of deep learning and neural networks, chatbots have gained a lot of popularity and have become a proven, and efficient tool to interact and provide service to users. Healthcare is one of the most promising fields where chatbots can be used more efficiently. This has become important, especially in the current medical landscape, where there is a shortage of doctors, and patients often have to wait long periods before getting any medical guidance. By using the power of transformer models and machine learning algorithms chatbots can help patients with personalized diagnoses and treatment recommendations, efficiently at ease and convenience. This helps the patients to access medical services anywhere, at any point in time. This paper proposes a well-planned systematic architecture for a medical chatbot that utilizes the potential of transformers, classification algorithms and machine-learning models. The architecture includes three main components: a Naïve Bayes Classifier, a Binary Tree classifier along with a Support Vector Classifier, and a sequence-to-sequence model. These algorithms are used to classify symptoms and determine the severity of a medical condition to provide patients with accurate medical diagnoses and treatment recommendations. Overall, the proposed architecture is built and designed to bridge the gap between doctors and patients by providing immediate access to medical advice, making it a promising tool for improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAI in Service InteractionsFrench-language works237,207