Deep Learning based Chatbot Architecture for Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the exponential growth and rapid development in the fields of deep learning and neural networks, chatbots have gained a lot of popularity and have become a proven, and efficient tool to interact and provide service to users. Healthcare is one of the most promising fields where chatbots can be used more efficiently. This has become important, especially in the current medical landscape, where there is a shortage of doctors, and patients often have to wait long periods before getting any medical guidance. By using the power of transformer models and machine learning algorithms chatbots can help patients with personalized diagnoses and treatment recommendations, efficiently at ease and convenience. This helps the patients to access medical services anywhere, at any point in time. This paper proposes a well-planned systematic architecture for a medical chatbot that utilizes the potential of transformers, classification algorithms and machine-learning models. The architecture includes three main components: a Naïve Bayes Classifier, a Binary Tree classifier along with a Support Vector Classifier, and a sequence-to-sequence model. These algorithms are used to classify symptoms and determine the severity of a medical condition to provide patients with accurate medical diagnoses and treatment recommendations. Overall, the proposed architecture is built and designed to bridge the gap between doctors and patients by providing immediate access to medical advice, making it a promising tool for improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it