Ventral targeted anterior capsulotomy for treatment-resistant depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A treatment method with cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ablative surgery using bilateral anterior capsulotomy (BAC) is an option for treatment resistant depression (TRD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (TROCD). The location extent of the lesion within anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) remains uncertain. Accumulating evidence has suggested that the lesion should be located ventrally while limiting the dorsal extent. Our center is now targeting specific fiber tracts within the lower half of the ALIC. Presurgical diffusion tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was used to identify individual fibre tracts within the ventral aspect of the ALIC in the last two patients who underwent BAC at our center. One patient had TRD and the other had both TROCD and TRD. Radiofrequency-induced thermal lesions were created in the identified targets with lesion volumes between 20 and 229 mm3 (average 95 mm3). Both patients were responders with neither experiencing significant side effects including compromised executive functions. The generalizability of our findings is limited because the outcome is based on two subjects. This work suggests that BAC can be individually tailored and more limited to the ventral aspect of the ALIC and is effective and safe for TRD and TROCD. Accumulating data also suggests that to be clinically effective the length of the capsulotomy should be about 10mm. BAC’s use may increase with the growing utilization and mastery of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".