MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Behavior of strain stripe networks in barium titanate nanocrystals on crossing its ferroelectric phase transition

2024· article· en· W4391134737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesBrookhaven National LaboratoryEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceMajor State Basic Research Development Program of ChinaEnvironmental Studies Research FundsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemBarium titanateMaterials scienceFerroelectricityCondensed matter physicsPhase transitionNanocrystalPhase (matter)Strain (injury)DiffractionPiezoelectricityDomain (mathematical analysis)CrystallographyOpticsCrystal structureNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsPhysicsDielectricComposite materialChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanoscale strain networks are reported in <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mi>BaTi</a:mi><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="normal">O</a:mi><a:mn>3</a:mn></a:msub></a:mrow></a:math> (BTO) crystals of 300 nm size using Bragg coherent diffractive imaging. BTO nanocrystals with clear facets were chosen to identify the crystallographic directions, allowing the strain field direction and periodicity to be studied in detail. Stripes of strain were observed, which were both stable and preserved in tetragonal and cubic phases at elevated temperatures, above the tetragonal-to-cubic phase transition. A finite element analysis approach was used to simulate the domain structures inside a BTO crystal and to understand the origins of the strain stripes as piezoelectric blocks. A <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:msup><c:mn>180</c:mn><c:mo>∘</c:mo></c:msup></c:math> domain model gives a better qualitative match to the experimental images. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it