De la ludification béhaviorale à la ludification humaniste : le « tiers symbolisant » comme médiation dans l’acte communicationnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En tant que mode spécifique d’organisation du sens, la ludification s’inscrit dans des processus communicationnels. Or, dans ce contexte d’échange entre un émetteur et un récepteur intervient un troisième terme, le tiers symbolisant, qui inscrit la communication dans une relation triadique. Concept développé par Louis Quéré (1982), le tiers symbolisant offre un modèle explicatif de la complexité de la communication qui s’applique parfaitement en contexte d’échange où la ludification est utilisée pour communiquer. Dans ce chapitre, il s’agira d’évaluer ce que peut nous apprendre le concept de tiers symbolisant sur la manière dont la ludification est productrice de sens (émetteur) et message à interpréter (récepteur) et ce que cette forme langagière nous dit de notre conception de l’humain, des relations intersubjectives et du vivre ensemble selon qu’elle a des visées béhaviorales ou humanistes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".