Phosphorus availability and speciation in soils amended with upcycled dairy-waste nutrients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The excessive application of dairy manure to soils to supply plant nutrients can result in increased offsite nutrient transport and degraded water quality. However, by concentrating nutrients from dairy-waste onto biochar or as biosolids, a viable alternative fertilizer can be produced that will benefit soil health, promote carbon sequestration, and decrease nutrient leaching into surface waters. In this study, a greenhouse experiment was conducted to assess soil phosphorus (P) speciation and barley plant growth in soils amended with dairy-waste treated biochar and fermented manure. Phosphorus characterization in the post-harvest soils was determined using selective extractions, 31 P-NMR and XANES spectroscopy, and isotopic tracing (P-δ 18 O). Selective extractions and NMR spectroscopy revealed that most of the P in the amended soils occurred as inorganic species (>85%). XANES spectroscopy further showed that the soil P occurred as either calcium-P minerals (54%–87%) or adsorbed P (0%–46%) species. Analysis by P-δ 18 O in water and sodium bicarbonate extractions of the treated soils showed that the water-extracted P pool is cycled much faster than the sodium bicarbonate extracted P. Although less than 10% of the total P in the dairy-derived bioproducts was extracted using water, plant productivity in the soils treated with these amendments was the same as that in soils treated with equivalent amounts of conventional nitrogen and P fertilizer. This suggests that dairy-derived bioproducts are good soil amendments to supply nutrients and limit leaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it