Investigating the influence of surface shear stress on the stability of gravity‐driven multilayer liquid flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We conducted a linear stability analysis on the behaviour of two gravity‐driven Newtonian liquid layers flowing down an inclined rigid plane, subjected to external shear stress at the free surface, in both the direction of and opposite to gravity. A long wave asymptotic analysis was conducted to examine the influence of several parameters, including liquid film thickness ( β ), viscosity ratio ( μ r ), and external shear stress ( τ ), on the interfacial modes of both gas–liquid (GL) and liquid–liquid (LL). For viscosity ratios ( μ r ) < 1 and Reynolds number (Re) = 0, the observations indicate that the LL mode exhibits instability attributed to O( k ) instability. This phenomenon is manifest when an external shear stress is applied at the GL interface, specifically within a defined range of negative shear stress values. When and , the investigation reveals the presence of two complex conjugate roots when external shear stress opposes the direction of gravity. One of these roots, referred to as the positive root, is associated with the leading (or zero) order instability that renders the GL mode unstable. The other root corresponds to the leading (or zero) order stability, contributing to the stability of the LL mode. In contrast, when external shear stress acts along the gravity direction, we observe that the GL mode is stable while the LL mode becomes unstable due to O( k ) instability for various values of β . This finding highlights the importance of the direction of external shear stress in determining the interfacial mode's stability behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".