MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391143751 · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1371633

Editorial: Industrialization and commercialization in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: 2022/2023

2024· editorial· en· W4391143751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kim S. Siow, Wen Shi, Behnam Akhavan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommercializationRegenerative medicineIndustrialisationTissue engineeringNanotechnologyEngineering ethicsEngineeringChemistryBusinessBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceBiologyStem cellPolitical scienceCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In brief, the first article entitled "Weakly acidic microenvironment of the wound bed boosting the efficacy of acidic fibroblast growth factor to promote skin regeneration." explores the effects of acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF) in a weakly acidic microenvironment for skin regeneration. It investigates the enhanced efficacy of aFGF under these conditions, which could have implications for improving skin regeneration techniques.The second article is titled "Antibacterial, injectable, and adhesive hydrogel promotes skin healing." It details the development of a novel hydrogel based on carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS) and polyethylenimine (PEI), focusing on its physical properties, antibacterial abilities, and potential for wound healing applications. The study delves into the preparation, characterization, and in vitro/in vivo testing of the hydrogel, demonstrating its efficacy in promoting skin regeneration and its possible future use in medical applications.The third article, "Immune evaluation of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor loaded hierarchically 3D nanofiber scaffolds in a humanized mice model," focuses on the immune responses to biomaterials used in tissue regeneration. It examines the effectiveness of GM-CSF loaded 3D radially aligned nanofiber scaffolds in humanized mice models, revealing their potential in tissue regeneration by promoting cell migration and enhancing immune responses.The final article, titled "Market of tissue engineering in Canada from 2011 to 2020," presents a comprehensive market analysis of tissue engineering in Canada. It details the growth, trends, and potential of the tissue engineering industry, focusing on various segments like bioprinting, biomaterials, cells and biomaterials, and stem cells. The study emphasizes the significant growth of the industry in Canada, underscoring the contributions of various companies and their impact on healthcare, particularly in addressing infectious diseases and life-threatening disorders.The papers in this issue highlight key successes and learning points in TERM. For instance, the first paper demonstrates the critical role of pH in enhancing growth factors for skin regeneration, while the second features the creation of an innovative hydrogel system for wound healing. On the other hand, challenges faced in these studies, such as the complexities of immune responses to biomaterials discussed in the third paper, and the marketing barriers and segments outlined in the fourth, provide valuable lessons.These insights emphasize the importance of overcoming technical and commercialization challenges in TERM to achieve clinical and market success. The articles in this issue collectively underscore the rapid advancements in TERM. They emphasize the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach, blending scientific discovery with engineering innovation for effective clinical translation. This synergy is crucial in developing practical and impactful healthcare solutions. It underlines TERM's expansive potential, from laboratory research to commercialization, reinforcing its significance in modern medical science and industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologySame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207