Experiencing Cambodia’s Living Arts through Tourism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Experience Cambodian Living Arts (CLA) was a nightly program showcasing traditional Cambodian arts to tourists while providing employment opportunities to artists. Produced by the Cambodia-based non-profit organization CLA for nearly a decade, this program used tourism as a platform for sharing traditional arts while also earning revenue to support other arts initiatives and providing employment to several of its arts students. This case study offers a glimpse into the arts-based programming of CLA, an organization based in Cambodia that has worked to revitalize traditional arts and inspire younger generations to engage with the arts over the past 25 years. ‘Experience CLA’ was one of the organization’s programs that offered nightly performances of traditional dance, music and performing arts between 2011 and 2020. These performances stood at the heart of CLA’s efforts in sharing traditional arts with international visitors through tourism, providing a platform for employment to young Cambodian artists, as well as helping the organization to earn revenue. However, due to the impact of COVID-19 on tourism as well as CLA adopting a new mission and vision that positioned it as more of an arts catalyst, rather than as an arts provider, the ‘Experience CLA’ program came to an end in 2020 as the organization began to shift its role in the Cambodian arts community. Information © The Authors 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".