MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391162097 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0598

P468 Relevance of anti-drug antibodies in context of supra-therapeutic anti-TNF concentrations

2024· article· en· W4391162097 on OpenAlexaff
J Kim, Margaret Walshe, Krzysztof Borowski, Raquel Milgrom, Joanne M. Stempak, S H Lee, Kenneth Croitoru, Mark S. Silverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)DrugRelevance (law)AntibodyTumor necrosis factor alphaPharmacologyMedicineImmunologyBiologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The low serum concentration of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents and the presence of anti-drug antibodies are related to poor therapeutic outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients having both antidrug antibodies and supratherapeutic drug concentrations. Methods IBD patients on maintenance infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) therapy were prospectively recruited. Serum drug concentrations and antidrug antibodies were measured (Anser, Prometheus). The drug concentrations were classified as subtherapeutic (IFX: <3 µg/mL; ADA: <5 µg/mL), therapeutic (IFX: 3-8 µg/mL; ADA 5-10 µg/mL), and supratherapeutic (IFX > 8 µg/mL; ADA > 10 µg/mL) concentrations regardless of the timing of blood sample collection. We analysed the relationship between i) drug concentrations and ii) the presence and absence of anti-drug antibodies with use of systemic corticosteroids and anti-TNF discontinuation. Results Of 172 patients (122 CD [70.9%], 44 UC [25.6%], 3 IBD-U [1.7%], and 3 IBD-pouch [1.7%]), the median age was 32.3 years (range, 24.8-42.5), and the median duration of IBD was 9.7 years (range 5.3-15.6). IFX and ADA were used in 81 (47.1%) and 91 (52.9%) patients, respectively, and concurrent usage of immunomodulators and systemic corticosteroids was observed in 39 (22.7%) and 23 (13.4%) patients, respectively. Supratherapeutic, therapeutic, and subtherapeutic concentrations were observed in 74 (43.0%), 32 (18.6%), and 66 (38.4%), respectively. The patients with antidrug antibodies (n = 79, 45.9%) showed a higher frequency of having subtherapeutic drug concentrations (68.4% vs 12.9%, P < 0.001) compared to those without antibodies, and the presence of antibodies was an independent predictor of discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents (hazard ratio 3.50, 95% confidence interval 1.88-6.51, P < 0.001, Fig. 1A). In subgroup analysis, patients with antidrug antibodies and supratherapeutic drug concentration exhibited a tendency to have improved drug persistence compared to those with subtherapeutic drug concentration, albeit insignificantly (P = 0.099, Fig. 1B). However, the persistence in this group was still poorer than that observed in patients without antibodies (P = 0.003). Finally, neither anti-TNFα concentrations nor the presence of antidrug antibodies were associated with the need for additional systemic corticosteroid use within 6 months. Conclusion The presence of antidrug antibodies can predict the discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents despite supratherapeutic drug levels. While supratherapeutic drug concentration may improve the treatment persistence of anti-TNFα agents in patients with anti-drug antibodies, it does not last as long as in those without antibodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→