MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391162349 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0875

P745 Assessment of Crohn’s disease patients following risankizumab initiation using intestinal ultrasound: A prospective study

2024· article· en· W4391162349 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan E. Rosentreter, R Ingram, Christopher Ma, Melissa Chan, Tushar Shukla, Shane Devlin, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cynthia H. Seow, Remo Panaccione, Kerri L. Novak, Cathy Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseCrohn diseaseInternal medicineProspective cohort studyGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Risankizumab (RIS) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-23 by binding to its p19 subunit. The use of RIS in the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn’s Disease (CD) was approved in December 2022. Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is an accurate and well-tolerated modality for evaluating response to therapy. Here, we assessed the IUS response at 3 and 6 months following RIS therapy. Methods CD patients initiating RIS were recruited and evaluated by IUS at baseline (within 14 days of initiation), 3, and 6 months. Data elements collected at baseline included demographics, medication exposures, surgical history, as well as inflammatory biomarkers. IUS response (decrease in bowel wall thickness (BWT) ≥ 25%)) and transmural remission (TR) (normalization of BWT normalization, color doppler signal (CDS, modified Limberg (ML) score 0), wall stratification, inflammatory fat)) for each segment were evaluated. Paired t-tests were used to compare values at 3 and 6 months relative to baseline. Results A total of thirty-three (20, 60.6% female) patients were recruited; 30 completed baseline and 3 month IUS, while 18 patients have also completed a 6 month IUS. Median age was 55 years (IQR 39-63), with a 12 year median CD duration (IQR 5-28). Five had inflammatory behaviour, 19 had stricturing, and 6 had fistulizing behaviour. CD distribution was 18 ileal, 1 colonic, and 11 ileocolonic. Baseline mean CRP (4.1 ± 4.9 mg/L) did not differ at 3 months (5.0 ± 6.8 mg/L, p=0.16), nor at 6 months for patients with values available (6.2mg/L ± 8.3, p = 0.38). Of patients with FC concentrations, 3 month mean FC (129.4 ±70 mcg/g) (9 patients) had significantly decreased from baseline (427.6 ± 271 mcg/g) (p=0.008), and similarly at 6 months (9 patients; baseline 396 ± 299 vs. 129 ± 75, p = 0.02). 80.0% (4/5) patients with colonic BWT > 3mm had IUS response (baseline mean BWT 5.6±1.4mm vs 3.5 ± 0.8mm at 3 months (p=0.011). IUS response was achieved in 20% (5/25) with ileal CD at 3 months (BWT 6.3 ± 2.1mm vs 3 month 6.0 ± 2.5mm (p=0.31). 21.4% (3/14) of ileal CD patients had an IUS response at 6 months. There was a non-significant ileal BWT reduction (5.4 ± 1.6mm) from baseline (6.0 ± 1.7mm) at 6 months. Of the 9 with moderate to severe CDS, 55% (5/9) had reduction to mild CDS by 3 months. TR was achieved by one patient with ileal CD at 6 months. Conclusion IUS response was achieved in 80.0% of CD patients with colonic disease at 3 months follow RIS initiation. IUS response was detected for 20% of ileal CD patients at 3 months and 21.4% at 6 months A significant FC reduction by 3 and 6 months was attained. Further prospective patient recruitment and IUS at 6 and 12 months to assess preliminary results and longer-term response is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→