P263 Clinical-Endoscopic Correlation of Postoperative Recurrence in Surgically Treated Crohn's Disease Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The majority of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require surgical intervention at some point in their disease course, particularly ileocolic resection. However, the average rate of clinical postoperative relapse is 30% at 3 years and 60% at 10 years. Endoscopic postoperative recurrence precedes clinical recurrence, highlighting the importance of conducting a colonoscopy 6 to 12 months postoperatively to establish the Rutgeerts score,which predicts the risk of clinical recurrence. The aim of this study is to correlate endoscopic findings with the clinical symptoms of these patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical symptoms and Rutgeerts scores of Crohn's disease patients who underwent ileocolic resection during the course of their disease, and followed at the Hepato-Gastroenterology Department of MOHAMMED VI university hospital in Oujda, Morocco, during the period [2018-2023] Results Sixty Crohn's disease patients underwent at least one surgical operation during the course of their disease, comprising 25 females and 35 males with a sex ratio (M/F: 1.4). The average age of our patients was 35 years [20-73]. The average time between diagnosis and the first surgery was 4 years. All these patients received postoperative medical treatment before colonoscopy, including azathioprine or methotrexate in 26 patients (43%) and anti-TNF in 34 cases (56%), with an average time of 8 months between surgery and the start of treatment. According to the Montreal classification, the ileocolic form dominated in 88% of cases, with a penetrating phenotype in 40% and a structuring phenotype in 60%. The operative indication was primarily obstructive syndromes in 85% of cases and collections in15%. The average time to perform colonoscopy after surgery was 10 months. During follow-up, 80% of patients were asymptomatic post-surgery, with Rutgeerts scores of I0-I1 in 11(23%) patients, I2 in 13 (27%) cases, I3 in 9 (19%) cases, and I4 in 15 (31%) cases.However, clinical recurrence, characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, or Koenig's syndrome, was observed in 20% of patients, with an average postoperative clinical recurrence time of 2 years. The endoscopic findings in these patients revealed Rutgeerts scores of I2 in 4 cases (33%), I3 in 3 cases (25%), and I4 in 5 cases (41%). Conclusion In summary, despite postoperative medical management, the risk of clinical recurrence isnotable. Early postoperative colonoscopy, assessing Rutgeerts scores, proves crucial inpredicting clinical recurrence risk. The observed clinical-endoscopic discordance emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to monitoring postoperative outcomes in Crohn's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".