MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391163012 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0003

OP03 Efficacy and safety of the oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate-1 receptor modulator VTX002 in moderately to severely active Ulcerative Colitis: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

2024· article· en· W4391163012 on OpenAlexaff
B E Sands, Remo Panaccione, Geert D’Haens, Stefan Schreiber, Aaron DuVall, Jarosław Kierkuś, Snehal Naik, Kye Gilder, Chohee Yun, W. Sandborn, Mieczysław Walczak, Séverine Vermeire, David T. Rubin, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Silvio Danese

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisSphingosine-1-phosphate receptorPlaceboDouble blindMedicinePlacebo-controlled studySphingosine-1-phosphateInternal medicinePharmacologyGastroenterologyReceptorSphingosineDiseasePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background VTX002 is a novel oral selective sphingosine-1-phosphate-1 (S1P1) receptor modulator in development for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). The efficacy and safety of VTX002 in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) was assessed in a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT05156125). Methods Adults (N=213) with moderately to severely active UC (modified Mayo score [MMS] 4-9) and inadequate response/intolerance to conventional and/or advanced (approved biologics or Janus kinase inhibitor) therapies were randomised 1:1:1 to once daily treatment with placebo (n=70), 30 mg (n=73) or 60 mg (n=70) VTX002 tablets for 13 weeks. Patients underwent a 6–8-day dose titration up to the assigned treatment dose. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (MMS stool frequency subscore ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore=0, and endoscopic subscore [ES] ≤ 1) at week 13. A protocol amendment limiting eligibility to patients with baseline MMS 5-9 resulted in 213 and 209 patients in the safety and efficacy populations, respectively. Key secondary endpoints were endoscopic improvement, symptomatic remission, histologic remission, and endoscopic improvement-histologic remission. Endoscopic remission and histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) were also assessed (see Table 1 for outcome definitions). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were assessed for safety. Results The primary endpoint of clinical remission at week 13 was achieved (27.9% of patients who received VTX002 60 mg vs 11.4% of patients who received placebo, ∆=16.5%, p=0.0184). Both doses of VTX002 achieved nominal statistical significance for all key secondary endpoints (Table 1). Significantly greater proportions of patients who received VTX002 60 mg achieved endoscopic remission and HEMI compared to patients who received placebo (29.4% VTX002 60 mg vs 7.1% placebo, ∆=22.3%, p=0.0012, and 32.4% VTX002 60 mg vs 10.0% placebo, ∆=22.4%, p=0.0026, respectively). A dose-dependent decrease of 67.7% and 53.9% in mean absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) from baseline was observed at week 8 for patients who received VTX002 60 mg and 30 mg, respectively. Most AEs were mild to moderate (Table 2). No AEs of bradycardia, atrioventricular block, serious infections, macular oedema, or deaths were reported. Conclusion The S1P1 receptor modulator VTX002 was well-tolerated and statistically superior to placebo for induction of clinical, endoscopic, histologic, HEMI, and symptomatic remission/response at week 13. These positive findings, including a dose-dependent pharmacodynamic reduction in ALC, support phase 3 development of VTX002 for treatment of UC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207