MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391164140 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3357893

Hirail: Core-Agnostic Deterministic Networks for Long-Distance Time-Sensitive IIoT Applications

2024· article· en· W4391164140 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Huang, Yudong Huang, Xinyuan Zhang, Shuo Wang, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, F. Richard Yu, Yunjie Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceJitterDistributed computingBounded functionNode (physics)Overhead (engineering)Computer networkReal-time computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the emergence of time-sensitive IIoT applications, such as remote operation and industrial control, a long-distance deterministic forwarding service is highly desirable. However, most of the existing research is limited to local area networks, or requires costly replacement of core network devices. Enabling incremental deterministic networks based on off-the-shelf technologies is a significant challenge. This paper designs a core-agnostic and cost-effective solution named Hirail to achieve the smooth evolution of long-distance deterministic networks. Firstly, we investigate that a time-discrete shaper (TDS) can be deployed at the ingress node to enable millisecond-level bounded delay. TDS functions similarly to the concept of buying time-stamped tickets for each flow prior to getting on a high-speed rail, thus avoiding the expensive modification of core devices. Then, to alleviate the flow aggregation problem under long-distance links, we utilize the inband network telemetry to construct the delay-aware network map and conduct adaptive source routing based on the map. Finally, an adjustable buffer at the last hop is devised for jitter reduction. Evaluation results show that Hirail can meet the bounded delay and jitter demands, and outperforms other solutions in terms of performance and overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207