MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391165154 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0186

P056 Cereal intake and diet-related microbial metabolites in faeces associate with recurrence of gut inflammation during food reintroduction in children with Crohn’s disease treated with exclusive enteral nutrition; iPENS a multicentre, prospective study

2024· article· en· W4391165154 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantinos Gkikas, Mario Lima, Shona Mckirdy, Lisa Gervais, Gillian Smith, Caroline Kerbiriou, Ben Nichols, F Zille, L. Armstrong, Tracy Jordan, Iain Chalmers, Helen Barlow, G Al Hourani, Rafeeq Muhammed, D Wands, Priya Narula, Millan S. Patel, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Simon Milling, Marco Gasparetto, Paul Henderson, David C. Wilson, Richard Hansen, R K Russell, Konstantinos Gerasimidis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesParenteral nutritionGut microfloraEnteral administrationGut floraCrohn's diseaseFood scienceMedicineFecal bacteriotherapyDiseaseBiologyMicrobiologyInternal medicineImmunologyBacteriaAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Faecal calprotectin (FCAL) rises rapidly in children with Crohn’s disease (CD) following treatment with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN). We aimed to identify clinical, dietary and diet-related microbial metabolites which associate with the recurrence of FCAL above 250 mg/kg after 21 days of food reintroduction. Methods Children with CD (age 6-17 years), clinically responding to EEN, were recruited, prospectively, from 11 UK hospitals (January 2020-May 2023, NCT04225689). They provided a single faecal sample before EEN completion (timepoint A) and 6 serial samples (timepoints B-G; 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21 days) in the first 21 days of food reintroduction. Faecal short (SCFA) and branched (BCFA) chain fatty acids were measured as proxies of fibre and protein bacterial fermentation, respectively. In faeces, pH, water content (%), Bristol stool score, total microbial load (qPCR) and starch output were measured. Clinical parameters, medications, CRP, ESR, albumin and anthropometry were recorded at EEN completion. Nutrient and food group intake was analysed with Nutritics®. Relationships with FCAL levels were explored. Results Thirty children provided 209/210 (99%) of expected faecal samples. FCAL (median [Q1, Q3], mg/kg) increased within 12 days of food reintroduction (EEN completion: 328 [154, 2370] vs 12 days post-EEN: 1123 (451, 2073), p<0.01) and remained high throughout follow-up. Negative correlations were observed between FCAL with acetate, whereas positive correlations were noted with BCFA (isovalerate and isobutyrate) and their ratio over acetate; the latter remained significant at all 7 timepoints (Figure 1A). Use of immunosuppressants, blood inflammatory markers, clinical and anthropometry at EEN completion were not predictive of FCAL increase post-EEN. In a subset of patients with FCAL<250 mg/kg at EEN completion, (n=13/30), subset regression using ‘end of EEN’ diet-related microbial data, generated a model with 91% accuracy to predict FCAL increase over 250 mg/kg at 21 days of food reintroduction, with isovalerate being the sole predictor of FCAL recurrence (Figure 1B). Average intake of cereal products (median [Q1, Q3], g/day) over 21 days was lower in patients who experienced an FCAL recurrence (FCAL<250mg/kg: 313 (223, 370) vs FCAL>250mg/kg: 186 (167, 217), p=0.013). Positive correlations were observed between the 21-day average intake of cereal products and concentration of SCFA at 21 days post-EEN; acetate (rho=0.38, p=0.041), butyrate (rho=0.46, p=0.0.01) and total SCFA (rho=0.41, p=0.026). Conclusion This study suggests that early FCAL rebound, following treatment with EEN, is related to an increased ratio of dietary protein to fibre bacterial fermentation and a lower intake of cereal products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→