Mental Health Literacy and Information Needs of Young Persons with Psychosis and their Support Persons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background First episode psychosis can significantly impact both young people and their loved ones who provide support. Recognizing that a young person is experiencing psychosis can be a crucial first step in accessing appropriate services. Higher mental health literacy may facilitate improved symptom recognition and reduce the stigma associated with psychosis. The aim of this research was to evaluate the mental health literacy and information needs of young people experiencing early-onset psychosis and of their loved ones who provide support. Methods Participants were recruited from an early psychosis clinic in Central Canada. A total of 57 service users and 43 support persons participated (N = 100) from December 2021 to February 2023. Data were collected through an online mixed-methods survey. Linear and logistic regressions were conducted to determine whether higher mental health literacy predicted improved outcomes among both groups (e.g., treatment satisfaction, psychiatric hospital admissions, use of crisis services). Linear regressions examined whether longer treatment predicted higher mental health literacy and lower information needs. Participants identified specific information needs and preferences through two open-ended questions, which were analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Results Higher mental health literacy significantly predicted higher treatment satisfaction among service users and support persons, and lower stress levels among service users. Longer involvement in the treatment service significantly predicted greater willingness to seek information about psychosis from a pre-determined list of sources, including family, friends, and mental health clinicians. Both service users and support persons predominately had a moderate to good understanding of psychosis and did not endorse stigmatizing beliefs about psychosis. Both groups had a broad range of information preferences. Participants identified additional information needs related to the themes: Psychosis: Diagnosis and Recovery, Treatment, and Healthy Functioning; and preferred to learn content through Reliable Sources, Group Programming, and Peer Support. Conclusions Findings highlight the important role that mental health literacy can play in treatment satisfaction for both young persons experiencing psychosis and their support persons, and provide a better understanding of information needs and preferences of these groups. These findings have implications for both psychoeducation and treatment planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".