MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391168663 · doi:10.56367/oag-041-11135

Innovating polymers: 100% recycled ECOPLASTOMER®

2024· article· en· W4391168663 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katarzyna Pokwicka-Croucher

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Government · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerBusinessMaterials sciencePolymer scienceEnvironmental scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovating polymers: 100% recycled ECOPLASTOMER® Katarzyna Pokwicka-Croucher, Founder and CEO of Ecopolplast, tells us about the company’s mission to innovate polymers through their eco-friendly Ecoplastomer® product, made with 100% recycled content that reduces CO2 emissions and ensures complete independence from virgin raw materials. Global production of polyolefins has increased by over 1000% since the 1950s. The amount of municipal waste based on these polymers each year is 2.1 billion tonnes. This is the amount of only one selected group of materials. Considering other types of polymers such as PET, PS, PA, PC, or cross-linked materials, i.e., XLPE and rubber, this amount will be several dozen times higher. This problem, along with environmental regulations, has increased consumer awareness and producers’ responsibility for plastic recycling. Certain laws and regulations (the European Union’s REACH (EC) No. 1907/2006, the United Nations’ Paris Agreement, and Canada’s carbon pricing policy (the ‘carbon tax’)) help to significantly mitigate the environmental impact of waste. A study of the EU market on a global production scale showed that the countries with higher conversion were Germany, Italy, France, Spain, Great Britain, and Poland (starting with the largest producers), which produced ~80% of plastic waste. Moreover, the depletion and the slow disappearance of fossil fuels, which are the raw material for the production of plastics worldwide, emphasize the need to find uses for the collected waste that will be recycled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access GovernmentSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207