MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391169426 · doi:10.3390/ma17030556

Capacitance Determination for the Evaluation of Electrochemically Active Surface Area in a Catalyst Layer of NiFe-Layered Double Hydroxides for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyser

2024· article· en· W4391169426 on OpenAlexaff
Zhong Xie, Wei Qu, Elizabeth Fisher, Jason Fahlman, Koichiro Asazawa, Takao Hayashi, Hiroshi Shirataki, Hideaki Murase

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLayered double hydroxidesCatalysisMaterials scienceIon exchangeLayer (electronics)CapacitanceDouble layer (biology)IonInorganic chemistryMembraneChemical engineeringDouble-layer capacitanceAnion exchangerElectrochemistryElectrodeChemistryComposite materialDielectric spectroscopyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The determination of the electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) of a catalyst layer (CL) of a non-precious metal catalyst is of fundamental importance in optimizing the design of a durable CL for anion exchange membrane (AEM) water electrolysis, but has yet to be developed. Traditional double layer capacitance (Cdl), measured by cyclic voltammetry (CV), is not suitable for the estimation of the ECSA due to the nonconductive nature of Ni-based oxides and hydroxides in the non-Faradaic region. This paper analyses the applicability of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) compared to CV in determining capacitances for the estimation of the ECSA of AEM-based CLs in an aqueous KOH electrolyte solution. A porous electrode transmission line (TML) model was employed to obtain the capacitance–voltage dependence from 1.0 V to 1.5 V at 20 mV intervals, covering both non-Faradic and Faradic regions. This allows for the identification of the contribution of a NiFe-layered double hydroxide (LDH) catalyst and supports in a CL, to capacitances in both non-Faradic and Faradic regions. A nearly constant double layer capacitance (Qdl) observed in the non-Faradic region represents the interfaces between catalyst supports and electrolytes. The capacitance determined in the Faradic region by EIS experiences a peak capacitance (QF), which represents the maximum achievable ECSA in an AEMCL during reactions. The EIS method was additionally validated in durability testing. An approximate 30% loss of QF was noted while Qdl remained unchanged following an eight-week test at 1 A/cm2 constant current density, implying that QF, determined by EIS, is sensitive to and therefore suitable for assessing the loss of ECSA. This universal method can provide a reasonable estimate of catalyst utilization and enable the monitoring of catalyst degradation in CLs, in particular in liquid alkaline electrolyte water electrolysis systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207