NAFKAH IN A FAMILY: A STUDY ON AWARENESS OF ISSUES AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to examine the level of awareness among students taking the course on Islamic Family Institution Management (HKR111) regarding obligations and issues related to financial support. The research method involves a questionnaire assessing the students' knowledge of financial obligations and their views on this responsibility. The study results indicate that awareness of financial obligations has not yet reached an optimum level, and most students only have a basic understanding of the concept of financial support. Educational background, religion, and residential area play a crucial role in shaping their perceptions on this matter. Students with higher formal education and upbringing in religious values tend to have a deeper understanding of financial obligations. Media influence also impacts their perceptions of financial obligations. Media content that tends to portray this responsibility negatively or superficially can influence students' attitudes toward the concept of financial support. Therefore, there is a need to enhance student awareness through formal education and religious teachings, as well as encourage the creation of media content that provides a balanced and realistic view of financial responsibilities. Overall, this study suggests that there is room for improving general public awareness of financial support. Continuous efforts are required to ensure that they understand the importance of this responsibility in shaping a responsible and ethical society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".