Novel pathogenic variants in Tubulin Tyrosine Like 5 (<i>TTLL5)</i> associated with cone-dominant retinal dystrophies and an abnormal optical coherence tomography phenotype.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Autosomal recessive cone and cone-rod dystrophies (CD/CRD) are inherited forms of vison loss. Here, we report on and correlate the clinical phenotypes with the underlying genetic mutations. Methods: Clinical information was collected from subjects, including a family history with a chart review. They underwent a full ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity, direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy, color vision testing, color fundus photography, contrast sensitivity, autofluorescence, and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and full-field electroretinography. Next-generation panel-based genetic testing was used to identify DNA variants in subject buccal swab samples. Results: analysis, structural modeling, and comparison to previously reported mutations, these novel variants are very likely to be disease-causing mutations. Combining retinal imaging with SD-OCT analysis, we observed an unusual sheen in the CD/CRD phenotypes. Conclusion: mutations derives from the photoreceptor's outer segments at the posterior pole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".