MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391188484 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110092

African foods for deep learning-based food recognition systems dataset

2024· article· en· W4391188484 on OpenAlexaff
Grace Ataguba, Rock Ezekiel, James Daniel, Emeka Ogbuju, Rita Orji

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttributionDiversity (politics)GeographyNutSociologyPsychologyAnthropologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

African foods have socio-cultural significance that extends through migration, tourism, and marriage. Africans travel and integrate within the continent through intermarriages. There are over a thousand cultural aspects that differ such as language, food, dressing, beliefs and customs. Food is one of the cultural aspects that Africans embrace quickly as they migrate and integrate socio-culturally. We considered the limited representation of African food research in the HCI community and propose to contribute the rich significant food datasets from two African countries: Cameroon and Ghana. List of Cameroonian foods collected are: Ekwang, Eru and Ndole. In addition, the list of Ghanaian foods we collected are: Jollof Rice, Palm-nut Soup and Waakye. Given the cultural diversity and our study's goal for cultural inclusion, we interacted with at least two locals from the selected countries, and they confirmed that these foods were universally recognized within their respective countries. The datasets were collected from YouTube, Facebook, the field (restaurants), Creative Common Attribution Google Images, and other Creative Commons Attribution sources. A total of 204 images of Ekwang, 206 images of Eru and 205 images of Ndole were collected. In addition, we collected a total of 347 images of Jollof Rice, 392 images of Palm-nut Soup and 400 images of Waakye. We present a meta-data description of the data, quality assessments of our dataset and opportunities for the HCI community to explore in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207