MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391192608 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v62i4.56030

Leading and Managing Indigenous Education in the Postcolonial World (2015) by Zane Ma Rhea

2017· article· en· W4391192608 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rubina Khanam

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican cultural and philosophical studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousIndigenous educationPsychologySociologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Leading and Managing Indigenous Education in the Postcolonial World, Zane Ma Rhea (2015) critically discusses educational leadership, educational management, and Indigenous education in the postcolonial world.The purpose of this book is to provide a critical, multiperspectival, and system level analysis of education services to Indigenous people by drawing attention to these academic fields in postcolonial Australia.In the multiperspectival approach, Ma Rhea provides in detail how and where these changes need to take place to engage Indigenous people in education.In system level analysis, Ma Rhea argues that mainstream education systems in Australia require changes need to be made at all levels to support Indigenous education.She critically analyses international Indigenous rights, social exchange, and complex adaptive system theories and highlights the Australian context.The author describes partnerships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people as social exchanges.With complex adaptive theory, the scholar explains how present education systems in Australia fail to engage Indigenous people because of colonial practice and power that exist in postcolonial Australia.She brings these theories into her discussion to argue that administrators, leaders, and managers of Indigenous education initiatives need to enhance their understanding of an Indigenist perspective.Ma Rhea emphasizes the rights-based approach in Indigenous education as a means of recognizing and honouring Indigenous people's economic, linguistic, and cultural rights in the postcolonial education system.There are five parts with 11 chapters in this book.However, my review does not follow a linear examination of each chapter.Rather, I provide a brief summary, explore key concepts, and critically examine the implications.I also state why this book is important for anyone interested in Indigenous education, and identify the shortfalls of the text. SummaryThis book addresses issues of leadership and management in Indigenous education within the postcolonial world context.The discussions in this text urge education administrators, leaders, and managers to rethink leadership and management of Indigenous education in terms of conceptualization and practice.Non-Indigenous administrators and leaders often struggle to find meaningful ways in which to educate Indigenous children.Therefore, they reapply colonial notions to solve problems arising in teaching Indigenous children.Ma Rhea claims that these administrators do not include Indigenous people in the managing and leading process in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicAfrican cultural and philosophical studiesFrench-language works237,207