MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391214865 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202401-0101cp

The Rise of Adaptive Platform Trials in Critical Care

2024· article· en· W4391214865 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation ProgrammeHealth Research Council of New ZealandMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinderoo FoundationNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNovo Nordisk FondenNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNovo NordiskFP7 HealthMedical Center, University of PittsburghUniversity of PittsburghNational University Health SystemEuropean CommissionOffice of Health and Medical ResearchNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreDagmar Marshalls FondWellcome TrustNational Sanitarium Association
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineCritical illnessIntensive careCritically ill

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As durable learning research systems, adaptive platform trials represent a transformative new approach to accelerating clinical evaluation and discovery in critical care. This Perspective provides a brief introduction to the concept of adaptive platform trials, describes several established and emerging platforms in critical care, and surveys some opportunities and challenges for their implementation and impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.332
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.431
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3320.431
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.019
Scholarly communication0.0110.016
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0070.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.497
GPT teacher head0.596
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsFrench-language works237,207