Assessing the Depositional Environment of Cretaceous Ge-Rich Coals in the Wulantuga Mine, Shengli Coalfield, Northeastern China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To provide a new perspective on the formation of the Ge-rich coals, the depositional environment of the Wulantuga coals was studied with the incorporation of coal maceral and geochemistry-based indicators. The results show that the No.6 coal seam in the Wulantuga mine was formed in a mire with a succession of swamps, fens, and marsh. The average contents of Ge in coals formed in different mires, from high to low, are swamp (220 μg/g), marsh (205 μg/g), and fen (185 μg/g). The accumulation of the No.6 seam has been divided into four stages from bottom to top based on the identified coal facies types. The reducing condition and gelification of the ecosystem environment ranged from strong to weak, to strong, and back to weak. The variation of Ge concentrations also occurs in the same way. Strong reduction and gelification of the ecosystem environments can favor Ge enrichments in the Wulantuga coals. Sufficient sources and favorable conditions are essential for the unusual Ge enrichments in coals. This study provides a new perspective for the depositional environment of Ge-rich coals and is useful for the exploration of Ge-rich coal resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".