Synthesis and Characterization of Uranium Complexes Supported by Substituted Aryldimethylsilylanilide Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the synthesis and characterization of substituted aryldimethylsilyldiisopropylanilide ligands and their respective bisamido complexes of U(III), (3,5-R 2 -PhMe 2 SiNDipp) 2 UI(dioxane) x ( 1, R = H, x= 0; 2, R = Me, x = 0; 3, R = t Bu, x = 1). We found that the steric bulk of the 3,5-R 2 -Ph ring affects the hapticity of the U–arene interaction. In the solid-state, 1 is a U–(η 6 -arene) complex, while 2 is a bis(U–(η 1 -arene)) complex. Theoretically calculated bond orders at PBE0 and PBE0-D3 levels of theory support these hapticity assignments. The 3,5- t Bu 2 -Ph rings of 3 are too bulky to interact with U and solid-state metrical parameters initially suggested a U–(η 1 -arene) interaction with one of the Dipp rings. However, bond order calculations show that this interaction is even weaker than in the previously reported ((PhMe 2 Si) 2 N) 3 U complex, leading to the conclusion that 3 is best described as a U–(η 0 -arene) complex. Molecular orbital analyses in conjunction with electron localization methods reveal that the U–(η 6 -arene) bonding in 1 is primarily electrostatic in nature. Some charge transfer takes place from the arene π orbitals to the U 6 d /5 f hybrid orbitals in addition to subtle δ-back-bonding. In 2 and 3, both π and δ interactions are substantially weaker, in agreement with the differences in the U–arene coordination modes. Surprisingly, attempts to generate less sterically bulky (3,5-R 2 -PhMe 2 SiNPh) 2 UI complexes results in disproportionation to homoleptic tetraamido (3,5-R 2 -PhMe 2 SiNPh) 4 U(IV) ( 4, R = H; 5, R = Me) complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".