MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391219134 · doi:10.29289/259453942023v33s1015

Incidence of interstitial lung disease and cardiotoxicity with trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4391219134 on OpenAlexaff
Leonardo Ribeiro Soares, Victor Domingos Lisita Rosa, Maysa Vilbert, Jéssica Lopes Oliveira, Mariana Moreira de Deus, Ruffo Freitas‐Júnior

Bibliographic record

VenueMastology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineBreast cancerIncidence (geometry)Meta-analysisPopulationCohortTrastuzumabCochrane LibraryIxabepiloneLung cancerSystematic reviewOncologyMetastatic breast cancerCancerMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the incidence and severity of those adverse events (AEs) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Methodology: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies, including mBC patients with HER2-low or -positive expression who have received at least one dose of T-DXd. The DESTINY-Breast02 study was also included after its presentation at the SABCS 2022. Our meta-analysis followed the Cochrane Reviews and PRISMA statement guidelines. The statistical analysis was performed using the R software, and the results are presented as pooled analysis in forest plots. Results: We included nine studies: three phase III RCTs, three phase II and two phase I non-RCTs, and one retrospective cohort comprising 1,443 patients with a mean follow-up of 14.9 months. The median age of our population ranged from 53 to 59 years. Most were non-Asian (40.5%) and presented with hormone-receptor-positive mBC (66.8%). In a pooled analysis, the incidence of ILD was 13.0% (179 patients; 95%CI 11.0–13.0). Patients enrolled in phase III clinical trials had an ILD rate of 12.0%, while the observational cohort reported a numerically higher rate of 18.0%. Most ILD cases, 84.9% (152 patients), were mild (grade 1 or 2). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported in 13 (7.3%) patients, and grade 5 in 14 (7.8%) patients. We assessed cardiotoxicity by the reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with baseline measures. Decreased LVEF was seen in 3.6% (95%CI 3.0–5.0%), and most patients were asymptomatic. A total of 11 patients developed prolonged QT interval, and four had left ventricular dysfunction and cardiac failure. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis reinforces the importance of close vigilance for pulmonary and cardiac toxicities in mBC patients on treatment with T-DXd. Early detection and management by a multidisciplinary team following the most recent guidelines may improve patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMastologySame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207