Impact of Isotopic Exchange on Hydrated Protein Dynamics Revealed by Polarized Neutron Scattering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the last decades, it was often assumed that in hydrogen-rich disordered samples, such as proteins in solution or hydrated powder form, incoherent neutron scattering from hydrogen nuclei dominated the scattering signal to an extent that allowed all other contributions to be neglected. As incoherent scattering arises solely from self-correlations, it further justified such a choice. Consequently, heavy water was often used as a contrast tool to highlight molecular motions in live samples. Coherent scattering, which implies the scattering from many nuclei and therefore collective processes, is another non-negligible contribution to neutron scattering where cross sections of other nuclei than hydrogen are significant. The recent advent of instrumentation based on polarization of neutron beams and the analysis of their polarization state after scattering for dynamical studies allows us to separate and shed light on the two contributions. In the present study we reveal that, unexpectedly, the isotopic exchange of water in the hydration shell of proteins arises on a much faster timescale than assumed so far. Moreover, the collective and local D-bond network relaxation of hydration water contributes to a high extent to the coherent scattering signal, at odds with usual “static” approaches used to estimate the relative impacts of dynamics in the sample. Hence, hydration water necessarily contaminates nonpolarized standard experiments. The findings are of paramount importance for all neutron scattering experiments where partial or full deuteration is used. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".